After watching the clip by Stephen Abrams and reading the blog posting, I am coming more to understand the significance of Library 2.0 in the local library. I really liked the quote that John Blyberg used in his post by Sarah Houghton.
“Library 2.0 simply means making your library’s space (virtual and physical) more interactive, collaborative, and driven by community needs. Examples of where to start include blogs, gaming nights for teens, and collaborative photo sites. The basic drive is to get people back into the library by making the library relevant to what they want and need in their daily lives…to make the library a destination and not an afterthought.”
In the past when I have thought about Library 2.0, I have thought it was just about technology. However, after reading the blog post, I realize that it involved more than just technology. It is the attitude of the library, not just what the library does or offers (although it has a lot to do with those aspects). The library has to learn to be relevant to today’s young users. For instance, Facebook is a huge deal. I know that many libraries, organizations, and businesses are making fan pages for FB users to add. However, is Facebook able to be accessed in the public library? (I honestly do not know the answer to this question. I haven’t tried to get on FB in my local library.) The library must take the steps to be visible, but they must not prohibit these things within the library environment.
The library isn’t the only one that is taking advantage of Library 2.0. Recently, the Sam Noble Natural History Museum had a slumber party that was modeled after the recent blockbuster “A Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian.” It was a very clever way to engage the public and be relevant in today’s society, and it didn’t involve technology.
This Thing gave me a lot to think about as to how a library can become more relevant to its constituents. Thank you for the very thought-provoking ideas!